We’ve lived so long under the spell of hierarchy—from god-kings to feudal lords to party bosses—that only recently have we awakened to see not only that “regular” citizens have the capacity for self-governance, but that without their engagement our huge global crises cannot be addressed. The changes needed for human society simply to survive, let alone thrive, are so profound that the only way we will move toward them is if we ourselves, regular citizens, feel meaningful ownership of solutions through direct engagement. Our problems are too big, interrelated, and pervasive to yield to directives from on high.
—Frances Moore Lappé, excerpt from Time for Progressives to Grow Up

Friday, August 16, 2013

Report shows that most Egyptians oppose Morsi's removal

Click here to access article from Middle East Monitor.
A report from the Egyptian Centre for Media Studies and Public Opinion has revealed that most people in Egypt are opposed to the removal of President Mohamed Morsi from office. Only 26 per cent support the coup, with 63 per cent against it; 11 per cent of respondents did not give an opinion.
I think that this is a major piece of evidence that the takeover of the government by the Egyptian military was serving the interests of the Egyptian military command (SCAF) whose primary sponsor is the US and their crony Medieval allies among the Gulf Cooperation Council. Clearly it was not done for ordinary Egyptians or for even national interests. The Egyptian army is serving the interests of the Empire.

This is an illustration of the workings of empire, specifically, of the US Empire. In spite of US officials' performances in the media of condemnation of the brutal crackdown by the Egyptian army against the Muslim Brotherhood protestors, it is clear that the tragic events now occurring in Egypt and Syria are primarily under the direction of the US and its sidekick, Israel, and to serve their interests of domination throughout this oil-rich region.

As M K Bhadrakumar wrote today in Asia Times Online (with some modifications):
The dilemma facing [While] the Obama administration continues to be that it is under compulsion to appear to support democracy in Egypt and live up to its own rhetoric to be on the "right side of history" but on the other hand it is under even bigger compulsion to safeguard the US' strategic interests in Egypt, primarily in terms of the junta pursuing policies that serve Israel's security interests and preserving the 1979 peace treaty as well as continuing to provide privileged access to the Suez Canal for the US Navy that is critical at the operational level to the perpetuation of Washington's military dominance of the Middle East and its regional hegemony.